• About R & M
    ▼
    • Matthew Ian Marks
    • Thomas Anthony Ricotta
  • Practice Areas
    ▼
    • Sexual Harassment
      ▼
      • Hostile Work Environment
      • Workplace Retaliation
    • Employer Discrimination
      ▼
      • Age Discrimination
      • Criminal Record Discrimination
      • Disability Discrimination
      • FMLA Violations
      • Gender Discrimination
      • Transgender Discrimination
      • Marital Status Discrimination
      • National Origin Discrimination
      • Pregnancy Discrimination
      • Race Discrimination
      • Religious Discrimination
      • Sexual Orientation Discrimination
      • Wrongful Termination
    • Education Law
      ▼
      • 3020a Hearings
    • More Practice Areas
      ▼
      • Employment Contracts
      • Labor and Unions
      • Mediation & Arbitration
      • Wage and Hour Disputes
      • Employer Defense
  • Resources
    ▼
    • FAQs
    • Client Testimonials
    • Employment Law Blog
  • Contact
    ▼
    • Queens Law Office
    • Long Island Law Office
    • R&M Careers
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Ricotta & Marks, P.C.

Employment Discrimination Lawyers

Google Reviews 5 Stars
  • About R & M
    • Matthew Ian Marks
    • Thomas Anthony Ricotta
  • Practice Areas
    • Sexual Harassment
      • Hostile Work Environment
      • Workplace Retaliation
    • Employer Discrimination
      • Age Discrimination
      • Criminal Record Discrimination
      • Disability Discrimination
      • FMLA Violations
      • Gender Discrimination
      • Transgender Discrimination
      • Marital Status Discrimination
      • National Origin Discrimination
      • Pregnancy Discrimination
      • Race Discrimination
      • Religious Discrimination
      • Sexual Orientation Discrimination
      • Wrongful Termination
    • Education Law
      • 3020a Hearings
    • More Practice Areas
      • Employment Contracts
      • Labor and Unions
      • Mediation & Arbitration
      • Wage and Hour Disputes
      • Employer Defense
  • Resources
    • FAQs
    • Client Testimonials
    • Employment Law Blog
  • Contact
    • Queens Law Office
    • Long Island Law Office
    • R&M Careers

347.464.8694
free consultation
free consultation

Home Blog Woman succeeds in ADA claim against Wal-Mart concerning drug test

Woman succeeds in ADA claim against Wal-Mart concerning drug test

By Thomas Ricotta on November 21st, 2014 in Americans with Disability Act

Many workers are probably aware that they cannot be discriminated against in the workplace because of their disability. They may not be aware however that those protections extend to potential employers. In other words, a disabled person cannot be discriminated on the basis of his or her disability during the hiring process either.

When this happens a potential employee can take legal action against the employer that did not hire him or her. A federal disability discrimination lawsuit against Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P., illustrates how such a case may turn out.

A woman instituted this course of action when she was not provided an accommodation for a drug test the passage of which her employment was contingent upon. Though as a result of end-stage renal disease, she was unable to provide a urine sample, the testing facility indicated that alternate tests were available. When she provided this information to the assistant store manager, management declined to order that the alternative test be given. As a result, the woman failed to meet the 24 hour requirement associated with the test and her employment record was closed.

Alleging that this action violated the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission filed a lawsuit. The case was recently resolved and Wal-Mart was ordered to provide $72,500 to the woman. In addition, the applicant drug screen form will be revised to indicate alternate testing methods are available to those who cannot take the regular test. The store is also enjoined from taking any future adverse employment actions on the basis of disability and failing to provide reasonable accommodations.

The world of employment law can be confusing to someone who does not work in it. As a result, an employment law attorney is usually a good place to start in situations such as these.

Source: The National Law Review, “Wal-Mart Stores East Will Pay $72,500 to Settle EEOC Disability Discrimination Lawsuit,” Oct. 24, 2014

Primary Sidebar

Schedule Your Free Consultation

  • Hidden
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Ricotta & Marks, P.C.

Queens Law Office:
24-11 41st Avenue, Second Floor
Long Island City, NY 11101
Long Island Law Office:
2174 Jackson Avenue
Seaford, NY 11783
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2023 Ricotta & Marks, P.C.
Disclaimer Privacy Policy